ArticleBrazilian oral research2025
Effect of pellicle modification with polyphenol-rich solutions on enamel erosion and abrasion.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dental erosion and erosive tooth wear in childhood and adolescence: from diagnosis to prevention.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Review
- Composition of Different Herbal Extracts and Their Impact on Initial Bacterial Colonization on Enamel In Situ.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring the Benefits of Cranberries in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2025
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to compare the effect of salivary pellicle modification with polyphenol-rich solutions containing fluoride on enamel erosion and abrasion. Human enamel specimens (n = 14/group) were assigned to five pellicle-modifying groups: GSE+F (grape seed extract +500 ppm F-); CRA+F (cranberry extract +500 ppm F-); NaF (sodium fluoride solution -5 00ppm F-); Sn+F (commercial solution, SnCl2/NaF/AmF); and DW (deionized water, negative control). The specimens were submitted to 5 cycles, each one consisting of pellicle formation (120μl, 30 min, 37°C, no agitation), followed by pellicle modification with the experimental solutions (5 ml, 2 min, 25ºC, 70 rpm), and subsequent salivary pellicle formation (120 μl, 60 min, 37°C, no agitation). The specimens were then submitted to erosion (1% citric acid, 10 ml, 1 min, pH 3.6, 70 rpm, 25ºC). Subsequently, they were submitted to abrasion with a fluoride-based toothpaste slurry in a toothbrushing machine (50 strokes, 200 g load, 2 min exposed to slurry). The enamel surface was evaluated with an optical profilometer at baseline and after the 5 cycles to assess the surface loss. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis followed by a multiple comparisons test (α = 0.05). Significant differences were found between the tested solutions (p <0.001). The highest surface loss was verified in the DW group (p < 0.001). The other tested solutions (GSE+F, CRA+F, Sn+F, NaF) promoted significant enamel protection against the erosive-abrasive challenges with no differences between them. In conclusion, the modification of salivary pellicle with both polyphenol-rich, commercial solution and fluoride solutions were able to protect the enamel surface from erosion and abrasion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.