ArticleBrazilian oral research2025
Properties of 3D-Printed resins for interim restorations: effects of printing and post-curing protocols.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microengineered bone models: advances and applications of bone-on-a-chip technology.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Biocompatibility of Direct 3D-Printed Clear Aligner Resins: A Comparative In Vitro Cytotoxicity Analysis.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Tribological Performance of CAM-Processed Interim Dental Restoration Materials: Effects of 3D Printing, Milling, and Post-Processing on Wear and Surface Topography.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Additive manufacturing for Dentistry: A comprehensive review of techniques and applications.Progress in materials science · 2026Article
- Surface Characteristics and Hydrolytic Stability in Milled and 3D-Printed PMMA Dental Materials.Polymers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study analyzed the properties of three-dimensional (3D)-printed resins designed for interim restorations and subjected to different printing and post-curing protocols. Specimens were manufactured with two 3D-printed resins for interim restorations at varying exposure times per layer, in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations (Tm) or using a calibrator (Tc). Subsequently, the specimens were post-cured for 5, 10, or 15 min. Trueness, surface roughness, and color analyses were performed. For biological characterization, the specimens were incubated for up to 72 h in a culture medium, and the extracts were applied at 24-h intervals to keratinocyte cells (NOK-Si). Cellular metabolism was evaluated after 1 and 3 days. Leaching of residual monomers from the extracts was evaluated. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test (α = 5%). The exposure time beyond Tc resulted in specimens with increased trueness and smoother surfaces. Color stability was also influenced by the type of resin and post-curing time; the longer the time, the greater the color change, allowing for brighter and clearer specimens. The resins were cytocompatible with NOK-Si, regardless of the printing and post-curing parameters, although residual monomer leaching was affected by the parameters tested. The evaluated resins were cytocompatible; however, variations in the exposure times per layer and post-curing duration affected their roughness, leaching, trueness, and color stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.