ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Evaluating the Reliability and Robustness of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities in Cardiometabolic Disease in NHANES, NHIS, and BRFSS (2015-2021).
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe United States uses the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to monitor disease trends and inform clinical care/prevention research. These 3 surveys share similar national estimates. However, the consistency of each survey's estimates by race has not been examined. Here, we compare prevalence estimates and disparities in cardiometabolic diseases across 5 aggregated racial and ethnic groups.
methodsWe examined the age- and fully-adjusted prevalence of cardiovascular disease and diabetes among non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Asian, and "Other" race respondents aged 30 years or older. Cardiovascular disease included self-reported physician diagnosis of heart attack, stroke, and coronary heart disease.
resultsAlthough overall national population estimates were similar, there was heterogeneity in estimates by survey. For heart attack and diabetes, each racial group had a higher prevalence in BRFSS than NHIS (eg, Heart Attack: Hispanic BRFSS: 3.4% [95% CI, 3.2-3.6], NHIS: 2.0% [95% CI, 1.8, 2.2]; non-Hispanic Black BRFSS: 3.8% [95% CI, 3.6, 3.9]; NHIS: 3.0% [95% CI, 2.7, 3.2]). Non-Hispanic Asian people had the lowest general cardiovascular disease prevalence across all 3 data sets (NHIS: 5.9%, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: 5.3%, BRFSS: 6.9%), while Other/multi-racial respondents had the highest prevalence (NHIS: 9.9%, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: 13.1%, BRFSS: 10.7%). However, the magnitude of these differences across data sets was small.
conclusionsPrevalence estimates for heart attack and diabetes were heterogeneous by race across surveys. These results highlight the importance of improving the representation of racially minoritized groups within national surveys to produce more precise estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.