ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Synthetic Data for the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Registry.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines-Quality Improvement registry is a vital resource for real-world cardiovascular and stroke data and research, containing >14 million records from >2800 participating hospitals. To facilitate and streamline research, we aim to generate a synthetic data set that increases access to real-world data and facilitates data exploration of the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry. We first randomly sampled 1000 records from the entire registry data set from 2005 to 2021 containing 7.8 million records. To preserve privacy and break the links from the original data, we shifted all data time variables and replaced all patient identifiers. To evaluate the generated synthetic data, we compared the distributions of patient demographics (eg, age, race, sex) and other key stroke-related measures. The generated synthetic data exhibited similar distributions in age, race, sex, and time-sensitive metrics such as door-to-needle time and time to intravenous thrombolytic therapy, demonstrating that this open access data set can provide all researchers the opportunity to explore real-world cardiovascular and stroke data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.