ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Body Composition Risk Assessment of All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Completing Cardiac Rehabilitation.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of once-weekly somatrogon in adults with growth hormone deficiency: a randomized phase 3 study.Pituitary · 2026Trial
- Body composition changes during cardiac rehabilitation and long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Adult weight change across the life course and cardiovascular disease prevalence and mortality: a population-based study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Once-Weekly Semaglutide Improves Body Composition in Spanish Obese Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A 48-Week Prospective Real-Life Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Body fat percentage and the outcomes of hip fractures in adults aged 50 years and above: a 1-year follow-up study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity, measured by body mass index, is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, the role of body composition, including body fat percentage and lean body mass (LBM), in cardiovascular outcomes has not been well studied in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aims to evaluate the association of body composition with cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in patients with CAD. METHODS AND
resultsBody composition was obtained via bioelectrical impedance analysis from 1291 patients with CAD before starting cardiac rehabilitation. Patients were divided into quintiles by body composition and analyzed in total and after sex stratification. All-cause mortality and a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events, including acute coronary syndrome, coronary revascularization, heart failure hospitalization, and stroke, were primary study outcomes. In the total cohort adjusted analyses, body mass index, body fat percentage, and LBM were not predictors of all-cause mortality or major adverse cardiovascular events. In sex-stratified analyses, among women, the third LBM quintile was associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality compared with the lowest LBM quintile (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.01-0.57];
conclusionsIn women with CAD, moderate LBM was associated with lower mortality when compared with low LBM, whereas body fat percentage and body mass index were not associated with mortality or major adverse cardiovascular events in either sex. Future research studying the implications of changes in body composition on outcomes in men and women with CAD is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.