ArticleActa medica academica2025
Evaluation of BI-RADS 3 Ultrasound Findings: the Frequency and Incidence of Malignant Lesions, and Tumor Size.
Article in Acta medica academica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of the research was to determine the frequency of BI-RADS category 3 findings in ultrasound examinations in relation to the total number of patients, the frequency of malignant lesions, and their average size at the time of detection in BI-RADS 3 ultrasound findings. PATIENTS AND
methodsA cross-sectional study was performed on 335 patients (aged 40-75 years) classified in BI-RADS category 3, at the Tuzla Breast Center, University Clinical Center, in the period from March 2017 to November 2020. A total of 13,760 ultrasound examinations were performed, using a Toshiba Xario 100 ultrasound machine with a 12 MHz linear probe. Patients were divided into premenopausal and postmenopausal groups, excluding patients with symptoms and those with previous breast cancer surgery. The images were stored using the Institution's Pictures Activation and Communication System.
resultsBI-RADS category 3 findings accounted for 27% of all ultrasound examinations (N=3.715). Of these, 9.02% (N=335) underwent recommended short-term follow-up. Malignancy was identified in 1.49% of these cases (N=5), with an average tumor size of 13.6 mm at detection. The malignancy rate did not differ significantly between premenopausal and postmenopausal patients (P=0.412). The overall diagnostic yield for malignancy in BI-RADS 3 findings was low, but clinically significant.
conclusionWhile the malignancy rate for BI-RADS category 3 findings is low (1.49%), careful monitoring and adherence to follow-up guideline are essential to balance early detection with avoidance of unnecessary biopsies and associated costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.