ArticleSurgical case reports2025
Two Cases of Adult-Onset Intestinal Duplication Manifested as Acute Abdomen: Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGastrointestinal duplication is a rare congenital anomaly, usually occurring in childhood and rarely in adults. It is most common in the ileum, but can occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract from the mouth to the anus. An adult case of intestinal duplication is accompanied by non-specific symptoms and, hence, it is often difficult to establish accurate diagnosis preoperatively in adults. CASE PRESENTATION: We experienced two cases of ileal duplication that was manifested as acute abdomen. In both cases, we performed emergency surgery with a tentative preoperative diagnosis of perforation peritonitis related to intestinal duplication. The first case was a 36-year-old male presenting with a cystic non-communicating intestinal duplication, which was perforated, causing abdominal pain. The second case was a 77-year-old male presenting with tubular communicating intestinal duplication, in which a fecal stone was fitted into the root of the duplicated intestine, and the duplicated intestine itself became abscessed, causing abdominal pain. Their postoperative courses were uneventful and the patients were discharged from hospital without any sequelae on the 5th and 10th postoperative day, respectively.
conclusionAlthough preoperative diagnosis is not easy, because the clinical presentation varies depending on the occurrence site, in-depth evaluation of preoperative CT images could lead to a precise diagnosis especially when considering intestinal duplication as one of the differential diagnoses of acute abdomen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.