ArticleiScience2025
Multicenter study for CH-VAD as a fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technological advances and clinical application of left ventricular assist devices in the treatment of advanced heart failure.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Worldwide research trends on left ventricular assist devices for heart failure: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Mechanical circulatory support devices in heart failure: a narrative review of current evidence, clinical applications, complications, and future directions.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The CH-VAD is a fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device (LVAD) designed for optimized hemocompatibility. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes of 77 patients implanted with the CH-VAD across seven centers in China from June 2022 to June 2024. Patients had a mean age of 57.5 years, primarily classified as INTERMACS 2 or 3, with dilated and ischemic cardiomyopathy as the main causes of heart failure (HF). The study reported a 91.6% survival rate at both 6-month and 1-year follow-ups, aligning with international LVAD outcomes. Key adverse events were infrequent, including low rates of right HF, reoperation for bleeding, and driveline infection. Importantly, no pump thrombosis or device failures were noted. The results suggest that the CH-VAD is a reliable and effective long-term mechanical circulatory support option for end-stage HF patients in China, warranting further studies for long-term efficacy evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.