ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Employees' attitudes and work-related stress in the digital workplace: an empirical investigation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Workplace telepressure and workplace cognitive failure among hospital financial personnel: a mediation analysis and latent profile analysis based on work-family conflict and self-regulatory fatigue.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Digital wellbeing experience in the workplace: development and validation of the Work-Related Human Computer Interaction Questionnaire.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Impact of AI-Enabled Job Characteristics on Manufacturing Workers' Work-Related Flow: A Dual-Path Perspective of Challenge-Hindrance Stress and Techno-Efficacy.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Protecting work engagement from digital fatigue: the contingent roles of leadership style and network ties.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the digital era, the integration of advanced, hyper-connected technologies deeply reshaped work dynamics and organizational practices, especially through the transformation of the spatial and temporal dimensions of work. This study examines the complex relationship between digitalization and work-related stress, with a particular emphasis on the impact of both digital activities (i.e., number of actions and virtual meetings) and employees' attitudes (i.e., job satisfaction, person-organization fit, engagement, and work-life interface) on stress levels. Methods: Drawing on data from Microsoft 365 activity records and an online survey of employees in an Italian AI firm, this study applies Factor Analysis and Generalized Additive Models to analyze the above-mentioned interactions in a highly digitalized context. Results: Findings indicate that the time-space intensification and extension of the working experience has a significant impact in terms of increasing work-related stress when exceeding certain number of off-hours digital actions and virtual meetings. Conversely, job satisfaction, perceptions of work-life enrichment and person-organization fit represent subjective employees' attitudes that significantly influence and reduce work-related stress in a digitalized working environment. Discussion: This study contributes to the existing academic literature by providing a more nuanced understanding of the dual impact of work digitalization on employees' well-being. Furthermore, our findings offer practical insights into the management of employees and their level of stress in digital work settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.