Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40008325›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2025

Speech outcomes in cochlear implant users depend on visual cross-modal cortical activity measured before or after implantation.

Brandon T Paul, Vincent Trinh, Joseph Chen, Trung Le, Vincent Lin, Andrew Dimitrijevic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Longitudinal adaptations in neural and behavioral systems following hearing restoration using cochlear implants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brandon T PaulDepartment of Psychology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2353-7631
Vincent TrinhOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Joseph ChenOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Trung LeOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Vincent LinOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Andrew DimitrijevicOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implants can partially restore hearing function in deaf individuals, but long-term speech listening outcomes vary widely across cochlear implant users. Visual cross-modal plasticity, where auditory cortical neurons upregulate visual inputs to assist visual processing, is one factor proposed to worsen cochlear implant users' speech outcomes because it may limit auditory processing capability. However, evidence for this view is conflicting, and the relationship of cross-modal activity to speech perception may depend on other variables such as the type of visual activity and when it is assessed. To clarify, we measured visual cross-modal activity during a silent lip reading task using EEG in a cross-sectional, observational study. The study tested visual brain activation in 14 individuals prior to receiving a cochlear implant, 15 individuals tested at least 1 year after receiving and using a cochlear implant and 13 typical hearing controls who did not use a cochlear implant or hearing aid. Cross-modal responses to the onset of a visual event were positively correlated to speech outcomes in cochlear implant users tested after surgery but were negatively correlated in those tested prior to cochlear implant surgery. In addition, cross-modal increases in neural oscillatory power in the alpha band (8-12 Hz) arising in the lip reading task were associated with worse speech outcomes in both cochlear implant user groups. Taken together, results redress claims that cross-modal plasticity is maladaptive for speech outcomes and instead suggest that this relationship depends on the time point of testing, stage of sensory processing and likely the relevance of the stimulus for speech. In addition, findings form the basis for new neural markers that are predictive of cochlear implant users' long-term speech ability.

Indexed as

alpha oscillationscochlear implantscross-modal plasticityelectroencephalographyspeech outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40008325
PMCPMC11851104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.