ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025
Rethinking Paradoxical Bulging of the Masseter Muscle Following Botulinum Toxin Injection: An Ultrasound Evaluation.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bulging of the Masseter Muscle Following Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Injection.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Deep-plane paradoxical masseteric bulging after dual-plane botulinum neurotoxin injection: a case report.Anatomy & cell biology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Paradoxical masseter bulge (PMB) is an uncommon complication following treatment with botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A). This is currently believed to be caused by the uneven distribution of BoNT-A within the masseter, resulting in stronger, compensatory, contraction of the superficial head relative to its deeper heads. Objectives: To visualize under ultrasound which part of the masseter muscle is chiefly responsible for PMB and to propose a framework for assessment and prevention of the complication. Methods: A case series of 6 patients presenting with PMB were identified in the practice of 2 experienced doctors over 24 months. Case notes, photographs, and videos were reviewed along with static and dynamic ultrasound examinations to assess masseter architecture and patterns of contraction. Results: In 7 of 8 affected masseter muscles, PMB was associated with retained movement of a deeper portion of the masseter bulging superficially during contraction. In all cases, the bulge appeared to originate from anterior or posterior compartments of the muscle. This supports the concept that masseter contraction can be classified functionally by anterior or posterior compartments, rather than anatomically by the traditional superficial, deep, and intermediate heads. Conclusions: Paradoxical muscle bulging of the masseter may originate from the deeper portion of the muscle bulging superficially. In addition, the authors propose that masseters can be considered functionally as having anterior and posterior functional units. This classification may enable clinical and ultrasound preassessment for anterior or posterior dominance and the injection technique to be adjusted to minimize the risk of PMB. Level of Evidence 5 Diagnostic:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.