ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025
Multidisciplinary care in pediatric severe asthma: A comparative outcomes analysis.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timing of High-Risk Asthma Specialist Enrollment and Severe Asthma Exacerbations in Children.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2026Article
- Advancements in diagnosis, preventive care, and future directions in the holistic management of pediatric asthma.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Evaluating a digital health ecosystem for asthma and air quality: an early feasibility study based on clinicians and patient-reported measures.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Ensuring Timely Pulmonary Follow-up after an Inpatient Asthma Hospitalization: A Quality Improvement Initiative.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: There are limited data comparing the effectiveness of multidisciplinary severe asthma clinics (SACs) with that of conventional single-discipline clinics (SDCs) for pediatric severe asthma. Objective: Our aim was to compare asthma outcomes between SACs and SDCs clinics and examine longitudinal health outcomes for patients with severe asthma who were followed in SACs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing pediatric asthma outcomes among patients with severe asthma between 2018 and 2022 who were treated at the multidisciplinary Arkansas Children's SAC with those of patients with severe asthma treated at SDCs. The primary outcome was acute health care utilization, including hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Secondary outcomes included systemic corticosteroid prescriptions and controller medications. For SAC enrollees, longitudinal outcomes including health care utilization, symptom control, and spirometry were evaluated 12 months before and after enrollment. Data sources included the electronic health record and SAC patient registry. Results: The study population included 280 patients with severe asthma, aged 5 to 18 years, from the SAC (n = 56) and SDCs (n = 224). The SAC patients were more likely to be Black (79% vs 52% [ Conclusions: The study highlights significant morbidity among predominately Black pediatric patients with severe asthma, particularly those followed in a SAC versus in SDCs at a tertiary care referral center. The findings demonstrate the value of targeted multidisciplinary approaches to reduce asthma utilization and improve outcomes among high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.