ArticleMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2025
Recombinant AAV batch profiling by nanopore sequencing elucidates product-related DNA impurities and vector genome length distribution.
Article in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Manufacture of adeno-associated virus vectors by a novel human-derived cell line HAT and comprehensive evaluation of the vectors.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- AAV delivery of full-length SYNGAP1 rescues epileptic and behavioral phenotypes in a mouse model of SYNGAP1-related disorders.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Article
- Quantifying DNA point mutations in commercially available AAV reporter vectors and plasmids.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- Advancing AAV technology: From capsid design to scalable manufacturing.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During production, recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) capsids are equipped with heterogeneous genetic payloads including undesired DNA impurities as well as truncated vector genomes. Comprehensive analysis of encapsidated DNA by long-read next-generation sequencing is destined to guide platform optimization and provide crucial insights into safety of gene therapies. We used nanopore sequencing for in-depth profiling of an rAAV9 batch produced using our proprietary split two-plasmid system in a 50-L bioreactor. We compared three methods for single-strand to double-strand DNA conversion and their impact on the sequencing data. We observed a distinct library size profile but comparable impurity distribution. We contrasted recent nanopore sequencing advancements such as the V14 chemistry and dorado basecalling software with the widespread V9 chemistry and detected a markedly increased read quality. Our data highlight a high vector batch quality with low plasmid-derived and host cell DNA impurities of random origin, critical for mitigating associated safety risks. Finally, we compared nanopore data with orthogonal SMRT sequencing data and observed a higher base quality, but largely similar length and impurity profiles. Taken together, nanopore sequencing is a state-of-the-art method for comprehensive, in-depth rAAV vector batch analysis during all stages of gene therapy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.