ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Advanced deep learning techniques for recognition of dental implants.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transformer-based models in dentistry: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dental implants are the most accepted prosthetic alternative for missing teeth. With growing demands, several manufacturers have entered the market and produce a variety of implant brands creating a challenge for clinicians to identify the implant when the necessity arises. Currently, radiographs are the only tools for implant identification which is inherently a complex process, hence the need for implant identification technique. Artificial intelligence capable of analysing images in a radiograph and predicting implant type is an efficient tool. The study evaluated an advanced deep learning technique, DEtection TRanformer for implant identification. Methods: A transformer-based deep learning technique, DEtection TRanformer was trained to identify implants in radiographs. A dataset of 1138 images consisting of five implant types captured from periapical and panoramic radiographs was chosen for the study. After augmentation, a dataset of 1744 images was secured and then split into training, validation and test datasets for the model. The model was trained and evaluated for its performance. Results: The model achieved an overall precision of 0.83 and a recall score of 0.89. The model achieved an F1-score of 0.82 indicating a strong balance between recall and precision. The Precision-Recall Curve, with an AUC of 0.96, showed that the model performed well across various thresholds. The training and validation graphs showed a consistent decrease in the loss functions across classes. Conclusion: The model showed high performance on the training data, though it faced challenges with unseen validation data. High precision, recall and F1 score indicate the model's potential for implant identification. Optimizing this model for a balance between accuracy and efficiency will be necessary for real-time medical imaging applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.