Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40008066›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Accurately Estimating Correlations Between Demographic Parameters: A Response to Riecke Et al. (2024).

Cody E Deane, Lindsay G Carlson, Curry J Cunningham, Pat Doak, Knut Kielland, Greg A Breed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cody E DeaneUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks Department of Biology and Wildlife Fairbanks Alaska USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-9154
Lindsay G CarlsonUniversity of Saskatchewan Department of Biology Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada.
Curry J CunninghamUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences Juneau Alaska USA.
Pat DoakUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks Institute of Arctic Biology Fairbanks Alaska USA.
Knut KiellandUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks Department of Biology and Wildlife Fairbanks Alaska USA.
Greg A BreedUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks Department of Biology and Wildlife Fairbanks Alaska USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Correlations between annual recovery and survival probabilities estimated from tag-recovery data have been used to quantify the demographic response of exploited populations to harvest. Deane et al. (2023) evaluated the bias and certainty of correlation parameters between recovery and survival probabilities estimated as random effects drawn from bivariate normal distributions relative to different prior distributions and sample size combinations. Riecke et al. (2024) observed that we incorrectly parameterized a precision matrix with Gamma priors and suggested using a Gamma(1,1) prior distribution for the standard deviations as an alternative. Riecke et al. (2024) provided results from tag-recovery models that estimate mortality hazard rates after fitting these models to tag-recovery datasets with large sample sizes. Here, we fit tag-recovery models to the data we previously simulated (Deane et al. 2023) while using Gamma(1,1) as the prior distribution for standard deviations while parameterizing these models to estimate recovery and survival in discrete time or to estimate cause-specific mortality as hazard rates. We compare our new results to previous results obtained while using Uniform(0,5) prior distribution for the standard deviations. When sample sizes were large, correlation estimates obtained with either prior distribution provided similarly reliable parameter recovery and inference, replicating results of Riecke et al. (2024). With smaller sample sizes similar to those available for most duck populations in North America, correlations estimated with either prior distribution were uncertain and ambiguous. With decreasing sample sizes, annual survival was estimated with increasing uncertainty when compared to annual recovery, likely contributing to the poor ability to estimate correlation. Consistent with the original interpretation of Deane et al. (2023) and previous literature, we found correlations were often estimated with high uncertainty such that the sign (+ or -) may be the only attribute of these parameters that can be reliably interpreted.

Indexed as

Bayesian analysiscapture‐mark‐recapture modelshierarchical modelsmultivariate normal distributionrandom effects

Identifiers

PMID40008066
PMCPMC11850757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.