ArticleCase reports in dentistry2025
Socket Shield Technique of an Ailing Mandibular Molar With Customized Healing Abutment: Graftless Management of the Hard and Soft Tissue Foundation Around Immediate Dental Implants.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is an established fact that postextraction ridge resorptive changes are inevitable and are very evident in the molar areas. Resorption in the molar sites can cause a reduction in the attached gingiva and affect the long-term success of the osseointegrated implant. To prevent significant postextraction tissue alteration, the socket shield technique (SST) was developed to preserve the buccal plate, over a decade ago. Since then, various studies showcasing modifications of the technique have been published mainly focusing on SST in conjunction with immediate implants in the anterior esthetic zone. Gluckman gave a collective term called partial extraction therapy (PET) which includes SST, pontic shield technique, and root submergence technique. He suggested using a graft material in the gap between the shield and the implant. Later, Siormpas et al. advocated a root membrane technique (RMT) and suggested that it may not be necessary to use the graft material. With the evolution of the technique, the terms SST and RMT are more similar to each other now, with the only difference in the sequence of shield preparation and implant placement. The shield is prepared first, and osteotomy is done in the former and osteotomy is done before shield preparation in the latter. The SST technique is often ignored as a possibility in the molar sites. Though technique-sensitive, SST with immediate implants in molars with a customized healing abutment ensures the maintenance of the original hard and soft tissue volumes in the most conservative way. The following case report showcases a stepwise, graftless management approach for a nonrestorable right mandibular molar with SST and immediate implant. Long-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on molar SST are encouraged to make a recommendation for routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.