ReviewJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2025
Antiplatelet Therapy in Endovascular Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms.
Review in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thromboembolism is one of the main causes of severe complications in the endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms, and antiplatelet therapy (APT) is necessary to prevent such complications. Conversely, prolonged APT has the potential risk of hemorrhagic complications; therefore, the timing of dose reduction or discontinuation is an important aspect of periprocedural APT. However, no clinical evidence of an optimal regimen of APT for cerebral aneurysms exists, and the selection, dosage, duration, or combination of antiplatelets has been dependent on physicians for unruptured or ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Many reports have shown that preoperative APT can reduce ischemic complications without increasing hemorrhagic complications, and some reports have shown that the P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value measured using the VerifyNow (Werfen, Barcelona, Spain) system is associated with periprocedural ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. Appropriate dose and duration management adjustments based on the platelet reactivity test, aneurysm morphology, treatment, and patient background may contribute to good outcomes. Although accumulating evidence exists regarding the efficacy of preoperative APT, there is no evidence regarding the optimal duration or discontinuation of APT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.