Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40007971›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2025

Antithrombotic Therapy in Carotid Artery and Intracranial Artery Stent.

Ichiro Nakagawa, Masashi Kotsugi, Shohei Yokoyama, Ryosuke Maeoka, Hiromitsu Sasaki, Ai Okamoto, Yudai Morisaki, Tomoya Okamoto, Kengo Yamada, Ryosuke Matsuda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Potential drawbacks of manual aspiration with filter devices in carotid artery stenting.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ichiro NakagawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Masashi KotsugiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Shohei YokoyamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Ryosuke MaeokaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Hiromitsu SasakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Ai OkamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Yudai MorisakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Tomoya OkamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Kengo YamadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Ryosuke MatsudaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal platelet inhibition is critical in patients with carotid and intracranial artery stenosis undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) and intracranial artery stenting (ICS). Many reports have highlighted the importance of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in reducing adverse neurological outcomes without a significant increase in bleeding complications during CAS. DAPT has commonly used CAS and ICS, typically with aspirin and clopidogrel, but clopidogrel resistance occurs in approximately 20% of Japanese and other Asian populations. One solution to clopidogrel resistance is using adjunctive cilostazol to suppress the frequency of stroke events and in-stent restenosis after CAS. Other antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor, and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors are under investigation. The duration of DAPT after CAS remains controversial, as a longer duration of DAPT after CAS is associated with lower rates of readmission for stroke, but increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. Regarding antithrombotic therapy in CAS with concomitant atrial fibrillation, the use of direct oral anticoagulants plus a P2Y12 inhibitor may be suggested for the optimal safety and efficacy of antithrombotic management. For emergent CAS in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), intraprocedural DAPT loading and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, as necessary, may improve stent patency without increasing the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. In ICS, aggressive antiplatelet therapy based on an assessment of platelet aggregation is also important to improve clinical outcomes. In addition, rescue stenting for AIS caused by intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large vessel occlusion is gaining attention. GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have shown promise, but are not approved in Japan. In conclusion, DAPT is essential for the perioperative management of CAS and ICS. Specific perioperative antithrombotic management remains unclear, but the potential benefits of antithrombotic agents must be weighed against the corresponding increased risk of bleeding complications.

Indexed as

antiplatelet therapycarotid artery stentingintracranial artery stenting

Identifiers

PMID40007971
PMCPMC11850812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.