Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40007901›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2025

Effectiveness of a universal film intervention in reducing violence against children and increasing positive parenting among migrant and displaced caregivers from Myanmar: a community-based cluster randomised trial.

Amanda Sim, Khaing Zar Lwin, Stephanie Eagling-Peche, G J Melendez-Torres, Seema Vyas, Francisco Calderon, Tawanchai Jirapramukpitak, Jamie Lachman, Sureeporn Punpuing, Andrea Gonzalez and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Amanda SimDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, The Offord Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada.
Khaing Zar LwinInstitute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University, Phutthamonthon Sai 4 Road, Salaya, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
Stephanie Eagling-PecheDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, 32 Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2ER, UK.
G J Melendez-TorresUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, South Cloisters, Heavitree Road, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK.
Seema VyasDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, 32 Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2ER, UK.
Francisco CalderonDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, 32 Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2ER, UK.
Tawanchai JirapramukpitakInstitute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University, Phutthamonthon Sai 4 Road, Salaya, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
Jamie LachmanDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, 32 Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2ER, UK.
Sureeporn PunpuingInstitute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University, Phutthamonthon Sai 4 Road, Salaya, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
Andrea GonzalezDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, The Offord Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada.
Mary SoanSermpanya Foundation Thailand, 103/5 Samak-sappakan Road, Mae Sot, Tak 63110, Thailand.
Nway Nway OoMae Tao Clinic, 702, Moo 1, Tha Sai Luad, Mae Sot, Tak 63110, Thailand.
Ivet Castello MitjansHelp Without Frontiers Thailand Foundation, 203 Moo2, Mae Pa, Mae Sot, Tak 63110, Thailand.
Greg TyrosvoutisInclusive Education Foundation, 11 Soi Ruamrang, Samaksapphakarn Road, Mae Sot, Tak 63110, Thailand.
Eve PufferDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Box 90086, 417 Chapel Drive, Durham, NC 27708-0086, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Parenting interventions have been shown to reduce violence against children and promote positive parenting, but evidence on interventions to achieve population-level reach and impact is limited in low-resource settings. We assessed the impact of a universal film intervention for migrant and displaced caregivers from Myanmar living in Thailand. Methods: We implemented a two-arm, cluster randomised trial in Tak province, Thailand, on the border with Myanmar. 44 communities were stratified by district and randomly allocated to intervention or control (1:1) using a computer-generated list of random numbers. Intervention group participants received a screening of a 66-min narrative drama film about parenting, followed by a 30-40-min discussion and a 5-min video and poster summarising key messages. Control group participants received information about local health and social services. Eligible participants were primary caregivers aged 18 years or older with a child aged 4-17 years at enrolment. Participants were surveyed at baseline, endline approximately 4 weeks post-intervention, and follow-up approximately 4 months post-intervention. Primary outcomes were caregiver self-reported use of physical and psychological violence and positive parenting, analysed using both imputed and non-imputed multilevel models estimating differences between study arms at endline and follow-up. Due to the nature of the intervention, participants and assessors were not masked. The trial was prospectively registered with Thai Clinical Trials Registry TCTR20230222005. Findings: Between February and June 2023, 2249 participants in 44 communities completed baseline assessments and were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 1116) and control (n = 1133). 2023 caregivers (n = 998 in intervention and n = 1025 in control) completed the four-week endline survey and 1909 caregivers (n = 961 in intervention and n = 948 in control) completed the four-month follow-up. Intention to treat analyses showed the intervention reduced physical violence (IRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.97) and increased positive parenting (β 0.46, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.95). No meaningful differences were observed for psychological violence between intervention and control groups, with imprecisely estimated effects close to zero (β 0.47, 95% CI -0.62 to 1.57). Small effects were observed for the secondary and exploratory outcomes of parenting knowledge, belief in the need for harsh punishment, engagement in early learning, family functioning, and social support. Subgroup analyses suggest that the intervention may be more effective at reducing physical violence among female caregivers and caregivers of female children and younger children. There were no reported adverse effects. Interpretation: Universal parenting interventions using a film-based entertainment-education approach can effectively reduce physical violence against children and increase positive parenting, with potential for scalability in low-resource settings. Funding: This study is part of the Global Parenting Initiative, which is funded by The LEGO Foundation, Oak Foundation, the World Childhood Foundation, The Human Safety Net, and the UK Research and Innovation Global Challenges Research Fund ((ES/S008101/1).

Indexed as

Child maltreatmentCluster randomised controlled trialConflictDisplacementEntertainment-educationFilmMass media interventionsMigrantsMyanmarParentingRefugeesThailandViolence against children

Identifiers

PMID40007901
PMCPMC11852669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.