Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40007893›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Understanding stakeholder views of the use of digital therapeutic interventions within children and young people's mental health services.

Brioney Gee, Tim Clarke, Jess Garner, Bonnie Teague, Georgianna Coote, Aoife Dunne, Rachel McGuire, Andrew Laphan, Manjul Rathee, Jon Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brioney GeeNorfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Hellesdon Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Tim ClarkeNorfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Hellesdon Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Jess GarnerUnit C, Health Innovation East, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Bonnie TeagueNorfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Hellesdon Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Georgianna CooteUnit C, Health Innovation East, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Aoife DunneNorfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Hellesdon Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Rachel McGuireIndependent Researcher, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Andrew LaphanNorfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Hellesdon Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Manjul RatheeBFB Labs, Shift Design, London, United Kingdom.
Jon WilsonNorfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Hellesdon Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Providing the growing number of children and young people seeking mental health support with timely access to care poses a significant challenge. Increased use of digital technology in the delivery of children and young people's mental health services has been proposed as a means of increasing access to treatment. Methods: We conducted three interrelated studies to provide multi-perspective insights into the use of digital therapeutic interventions within children and young people's mental health services in the UK. Study 1 used semi-structured interviews and an online survey to collect the views of digital therapeutic interventions of families who self-identified as facing additional barriers to accessing mental health support (n=13). Study 2 involved eight focus groups with children and young people's clinicians, service managers, commissioners, and policy leads (n=28), exploring participants' views and experiences of implementing and sustaining digital therapeutic interventions. Study 3 was a consensus exercise which aimed to identify actions needed to bridge the gap between the development and use of digital therapeutic interventions for children and young people's mental health through focus groups with parents/carers and professionals (n=17), and three Delphi-survey rounds. Results: Our findings revealed considerable enthusiasm for the increased use of digital mental health interventions for children and young people across stakeholder groups, but also identified key barriers to their implementation. Actions perceived to facilitate more effective implementation included: a) co-producing interventions, commissioning decisions and implementation plans with children and parents/carers, b) enhancing national guidance and local leadership, c) integration of digital offers within existing clinical pathways, and d) efforts to ensure accessibility and inclusivity. Discussion: Digital therapeutic interventions offer a promising solution to the challenge of improving access to mental health support for children and young people. Strengthened guidance and leadership, sustained funding and further evidence-generation are urgently needed to enable this promise to be realised.

Indexed as

childrendigital health technologiesdigital therapeuticsimplementationmental healthyoung people

Identifiers

PMID40007893
PMCPMC11850353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.