ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2016
Priority topics for the development of risk assessment guidance by EFSA's Scientific Committee in 2016-2018.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A proposal on bird focal species selection for higher tier risk assessments of plant protection products in the EU.Integrated environmental assessment and management · 2025Article
- Guidance on harmonised methodologies for human health, animal health and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019Article
- Guidance on risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain: Part 1, human and animal health.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018Article
- Guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2017Article
- Priority topics for the development of risk assessment guidance by EFSA's Scientific Committee in 2016-2018.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
EFSA asked its Scientific Committee to review its own cross-cutting guidance for scientific assessments in order to identify gaps requiring either new or the revision of existing guidance. Through strategic discussions, the Scientific Committee identified topics to be included in its 2016-2018 work programme without ranking their priority. Three topics were identified for activity leading to the development of new guidance: individual susceptibility and uncertainty factors; interpretation of epidemiological studies; history of use. These will be further discussed and introduced into the rolling work programme as time and resources become available. Work is already underway in three areas which will lead to new or revised cross-cutting guidance: chemical mixtures; follow up on the Threshold of Toxicological Concern approach; nanotechnologies. The Scientific Committee will continue to keep priorities for cross-cutting guidance across EFSA's fields of responsibility under review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.