Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40007844›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2016

Safety and efficacy of thiazoles, thiophene and thiazoline belonging to chemical group 29 when used as flavourings for all animal species.

EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of 12 compounds belonging to chemical group 29 (thiazoles, thiophene and thiazoline). They are currently authorised as flavours in food. This opinion concerns 10 compounds from this group. The FEEDAP Panel concludes that 2-isopropyl-4-methylthiazole is safe at the proposed maximum use level of 0.5 mg/kg complete feed for cattle, salmonids and non-food producing animals and at the proposed normal use level of 0.1 mg/kg complete feed for pigs and poultry. All the other compounds, 4,5-dihydrothiophen-3(2H)-one, 2-isobutylthiazole, 5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-methylthiazole, benzothiazole, 2,4,5-trimethylthiazole, 2-acetylthiazole, 2-ethyl-4-methylthiazole, 5,6-dihydro-2,4,6-trans(2-methylpropyl)4H-1,3,5-dithiazine and thiamine hydrochloride are safe at the proposed maximum use level of 0.05 mg/kg feed for all animal species. No safety concern would arise for the consumer from the use of these compounds up to the highest safe level in feeds. Hazards for skin and eye contact and respiratory exposure are recognised for the majority of the compounds under application. Most are classified as irritating to the respiratory system. The concentrations considered safe for the target species are unlikely to have detrimental effects on the terrestrial and fresh water environments. As all the compounds under assessment are used in food as flavourings, and their function in feed is essentially the same as that in food, no further demonstration of efficacy is necessary. In the absence of data on the stability in water for drinking, the FEEDAP Panel is unable to conclude on the safety or efficacy of the substances under this mode of delivery.

Indexed as

chemical group 29flavouringssensory additivesthiazolesthiazoline and thienyl derivativesthiophene

Identifiers

PMID40007844
PMCPMC11848005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.