ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2016
Dietary Reference Values for vitamin B6.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Choline and Its Companions: Inter-Related Roles of Choline and B Vitamins in Fetal Development and Offspring Health.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Maternal B-vitamin status modifies the risk of congenital heart disease in offspring associated with prenatal persistent organic pollutants exposure.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- A Simultaneous Determination of the BInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Nutrients, Phytochemicals, and In Vitro Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Lulo (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cellular and organismal function of choline metabolism.Nature metabolism · 2025Review
- Analysis of the Impact of Selected Vitamins Deficiencies on the Risk of Disability in Older People.Nutrients · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) derives Dietary Reference Values (DRVs) for vitamin B6. The Panel considers that plasma pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP) concentration is the biomarker of status suitable for deriving DRVs for vitamin B6. Considering that a plasma PLP concentration of 30 nmol/L, as a population mean, is indicative of an adequate vitamin B6 status, the Panel proposes to use this cut-off value to set Average Requirements (ARs). Population Reference Intakes (PRIs) are derived for adults and children from ARs, assuming a coefficient of variation (CV) of 10%. For women, the AR and PRI are set at 1.3 and 1.6 mg/day. For men, the AR of 1.5 mg/day is derived by an allometric scaling from the AR for women, and a PRI of 1.7 mg/day is set. For all infants aged 7-11 months, an Adequate Intake of 0.3 mg/day is set, averaging the results of two extrapolation approaches based on an allometric scaling: upwards extrapolation from the estimated vitamin B6 intake of exclusively breastfed infants from birth to 6 months, and downwards extrapolation from the ARs for adults applying a growth factor. For all children, ARs are derived from adult ARs using an allometric scaling and growth factors. For children of both sexes aged 1-14 years, ARs range between 0.5 and 1.2 mg/day. For children aged 15-17 years, the Panel derives the same ARs as for adults. PRIs for children aged 1-17 years range between 0.6 and 1.7 mg/day. Extrapolation of ARs by an allometric scaling considered differences in reference body weight. For pregnant and lactating women, additional requirements are considered, based on the uptake of vitamin B6 by the fetal and maternal tissues and the losses through breast milk, and PRIs of 1.8 and 1.7 mg/day, respectively, are derived.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.