Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40007789›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

The compressive strength development and pH of cement mortars incorporating high volume supplementary cementitious materials under accelerated curing.

Sumra Yousuf, Muhammad Rizwan, Belal Alsubari, Mustabshirha Gul, Muhammad Mahmood Ali, Muhammad Nasir Bashir, Abid Latif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sumra YousufDepartment of Building and Architectural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, 60000, Multan, Pakistan.
Muhammad RizwanMetallurgical Engineering Department, NED University of Engineering and Technology, 74200, Karachi, Pakistan.
Belal AlsubariDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Miami College of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Mustabshirha GulDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, 60000, Multan, Pakistan.
Muhammad Mahmood AliDepartment of Mechatronic Engineering, Atlantic Technological University Sligo, Ash Lane, Sligo, F91 YW50, Ireland.
Muhammad Nasir BashirMulti-Scale Fluid Dynamics Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, 120-749, Republic of Korea.
Abid LatifDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, 60000, Multan, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The durability and service life of concrete structures is primarily dependent on the performance of cement-based material (CBM). This performance of CBMs is linked to their pH directly. Literature suggests that when supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) are used, the pH of CBMs decreases as a result Ca(OH)₂ consumption during the Pozzolanic reaction (PR). With the construction industry increasingly adopting blended cements for their technical, economic, and environmental benefits, the use of high volumes of SCMs remains a subject of caution. This study investigates the pH behavior of cement mortars modified by replacement of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) with three SCMs (50 %): fly ash (FA), ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), and treated palm oil fuel ash (TPFA), both at early and later stages of curing. The pH values were measured at different curing ages, and thermal gravimetric analysis and X-ray diffraction were used to support the findings. Results indicated that the pH of mortars containing FA or GGBS showed only a slight decrease after 5 months compared to their initial pH values, remaining above 11.5, which is considered within the safe range for concrete durability. In contrast, the pH of TPFA blended mortars decreased significantly, dropping by approximately 14 %, indicating that TPFA had a more substantial impact on the alkalinity of the mortars. These findings suggest that the pH of CBMs is influenced by factors other than just the Ca(OH)₂ (Hydrated lime) content, such as the chemical composition and reactivity of the SCMs used, and that high volumes of TPFA may negatively affect long-term durability.

Indexed as

Ca(OH)₂CuringMortarpH valueSupplementary cementitious materials

Identifiers

PMID40007789
PMCPMC11850159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.