ArticleHeliyon2025
The compressive strength development and pH of cement mortars incorporating high volume supplementary cementitious materials under accelerated curing.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The durability and service life of concrete structures is primarily dependent on the performance of cement-based material (CBM). This performance of CBMs is linked to their pH directly. Literature suggests that when supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) are used, the pH of CBMs decreases as a result Ca(OH)₂ consumption during the Pozzolanic reaction (PR). With the construction industry increasingly adopting blended cements for their technical, economic, and environmental benefits, the use of high volumes of SCMs remains a subject of caution. This study investigates the pH behavior of cement mortars modified by replacement of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) with three SCMs (50 %): fly ash (FA), ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), and treated palm oil fuel ash (TPFA), both at early and later stages of curing. The pH values were measured at different curing ages, and thermal gravimetric analysis and X-ray diffraction were used to support the findings. Results indicated that the pH of mortars containing FA or GGBS showed only a slight decrease after 5 months compared to their initial pH values, remaining above 11.5, which is considered within the safe range for concrete durability. In contrast, the pH of TPFA blended mortars decreased significantly, dropping by approximately 14 %, indicating that TPFA had a more substantial impact on the alkalinity of the mortars. These findings suggest that the pH of CBMs is influenced by factors other than just the Ca(OH)₂ (Hydrated lime) content, such as the chemical composition and reactivity of the SCMs used, and that high volumes of TPFA may negatively affect long-term durability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.