ArticleHeliyon2025
Exploring benefits of speech and language therapy interventions for post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: A qualitative study.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aphasia Rehabilitation in India: Current Practices and Future Directions.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and Psychometric Validation of the Cyprus Aphasia Screening Test (CAST).Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The ability to understand and use language is impacted in people with aphasia, often requiring Speech and language therapy interventions to improve their ability to communicate. Currently, there is limited information concerning the experiences of people with aphasia who have undergone speech therapy in many countries such as Ghana where the practice of speech and language therapy is still in its infancy. Such knowledge is known to enhance the uptake of speech and language therapy services and improve both quality and reach. Objective: This study examines the perceived benefits of speech and language therapy interventions for people with aphasia in Ghana from the perspectives of those living with aphasia, their family members and Speech therapists. Additionally, this study sheds light on the interventions employed by Speech therapists in their pursuit of enhancing communicative competence among people with aphasia. Design: We employed a qualitative research design with a purposive sampling technique to recruit seven people with aphasia together with a family member and five Speech therapists. Participants: A total of 19 participants (7 people with aphasia, 7 family members and 5 Speech therapists) were recruited for this study. Methods: A semi-structured interview guide was used. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and subjected to thematic analysis employing the Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis approach, to explore and comprehend the participants' lived experiences Results: Our findings revealed that people with aphasia perceived speech and language therapy interventions to be beneficial as it enhanced their communication abilities as well as their quality of life. Family members of people with aphasia valued speech and language interventions as it gave them the opportunity to play a significant role in the recovery process of their family members with aphasia. Speech therapists described using a combination of impairment and functional/communication-based interventions to improve the communication skills and social participation of their clients with aphasia. Conclusions: Findings of the study indicate that people with aphasia and their caregivers experience significantly negative impact on their communication and quality of life, underscoring their profound appreciation for the relief provided by speech and language therapy interventions. Those who have undergone speech and language therapy interventions are inclined to recommend it to others due to its substantial benefits. This can be leveraged to increase the uptake of speech and language therapy and countries where the practise is still in its infancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.