ArticleHeliyon2025
InceptionDTA: Predicting drug-target binding affinity with biological context features and inception networks.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DualPG-DTA: A Large Language Model-Powered Graph Neural Network Framework for Enhanced Drug-Target Affinity Prediction and Discovery of Novel CDK9 Inhibitors Exhibiting In Vivo Anti-Leukemia Activity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of Drug-Related InteractionsUtilizing Deep Learning and LLMs for Prediction and Mitigation.ACS omega · 2025Review
- The application of artificial intelligence models in predicting the risk of diabetic foot: a multicenter study.BioData mining · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting drug-target binding affinity via in silico methods is crucial in drug discovery. Traditional machine learning relies on manually engineered features from limited data, leading to suboptimal performance. In contrast, deep learning excels at extracting features from raw sequences but often overlooks essential biological context features, hindering effective binding prediction. Additionally, these models struggle to capture global and local feature distributions efficiently in protein sequences and drug SMILES. Previous state-of-the-art models, like transformers and graph-based approaches, face scalability and resource efficiency challenges. Transformers struggle with scalability, while graph-based methods have difficulty handling large datasets and complex molecular structures. In this paper, we introduce InceptionDTA, a novel drug-target binding affinity prediction model that leverages CharVec, an enhanced variant of Prot2Vec, to incorporate both biological context and categorical features into protein sequence encoding. InceptionDTA utilizes a multi-scale convolutional architecture based on the Inception network to capture features at various spatial resolutions, enabling the extraction of both local and global features from protein sequences and drug SMILES. We evaluate InceptionDTA across a range of benchmark datasets commonly used in drug-target binding affinity prediction. Our results demonstrate that InceptionDTA outperforms various sequence-based, transformer-based, and graph-based deep learning approaches across warm-start, refined, and cold-start splitting settings. In addition to using CharVec, which demonstrates greater accuracy in absolute predictions, InceptionDTA also includes a version that employs simple label encoding and excels in ranking and predicting relative binding affinities. This versatility highlights how InceptionDTA can effectively adapt to various predictive requirements. These results emphasize the promise of our approach in expediting drug repurposing initiatives, enabling the discovery of new drugs, and contributing to advancements in disease treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.