ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025
Complementary Reinnervation in Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of synkinesis on voice restoration in idiopathic vocal fold paralysis patients with different disease courses.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To achieve glottal gap closure in unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) through complementary ansa cervicalis nerve muscle pedicle laryngeal reinnervation (ANMP-LR). Introduction: ANMP-LR is easy to learn and does not require recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) transection. Materials and Methods: Twelve patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) were included, who received ANMP-LR and could be followed up for at least 6-24 months. At baseline, after 3-6 (T1), 12 (T2) and 24 months (T3), Voice Handicap Index (VHI), perceived roughness (R) and breathiness (B), sound pressure level (SPLmax), maximum phonation time (MPT), Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) and glottal gap (GG) were recorded. Results: R and B were significantly reduced at T1, MPT and SPLmax increased significantly up to T1 (MPT to 15.8 s; SPLmax to 91.5 dB). Similarly, VHI dropped significantly and the residual glottal gap (GG) was significantly reduced between T0 and T1. All outcomes remained stable until T3. There was a non-significant tendency to further improvement until T3 in SPLmax and GG. Discussion: The T1-T3 outcomes of the complementary ANMP-LR are comparable with the standard LR and also with thyroplasty. As with all LR techniques, younger patients and those with shorter paralysis benefit more. Patients with evidence of unfavorable laryngeal synkinesis are more likely to benefit from a standard LR with RLN transection. Conclusions: Younger patients with insufficient synkinetic reinnervation and persisting or progressive glottis closure insufficiency in UVFP benefit from early reinnervation. When the easy-to-learn ANMP technique is used, any partial rehabilitation that has already been achieved or any remaining chance of spontaneous reinnervation via the RLN is not compromised.Level of Evidence: 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.