ArticleAnnals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine2024
TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE IN COMMUNITY OUTREACH: WHAT ARE THE LESSONS?
Article in Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transurethral resection of the prostate is the gold standard for treating benign prostate enlargement that presents with complications or worsening lower urinary tract symptoms despite medical treatment. We report the experience of transurethral resection of the prostate in indigenous community in the sub-Saharan Africa. Methods: Arrangements were made with selected communities for transportation of endoscopic instruments by road. Medical officers were taught on the inclusion and exclusion criteria for men suitable for transurethral resection of prostate. Scheduled visits were arranged between January 2016 and December 2019. Results: Fifty-five men age range 45-98years underwent TURP. The mean prostate volume, preoperative infection rate, operation time, hospital stay, postoperative day of catheter removal, and incidental prostate cancer were 52.5 cm3, 9%, 41.3 minutes, 2 days, 5 days, and 5.5% respectively. There was an increase in TURP per year from 4 to 20 patients. The postoperative complication rate was 4%. Conclusion: TURP in the indigenous and pensioners community is feasible, accessible, with satisfactory outcome. The government needs to support this initiative of scheduled community outreach to ensure modern day treatment is brought to the doorstep of her citizens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40007709PMC11848375What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.