ArticlePalliative medicine reports2024
Do Terminally Ill Cancer Patients' Self-Assessments and Nurses' Assessments Agree on Cancer-Related Fatigue? A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Palliative medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fatigue in long-term cancer survivors: prevalence, associated factors, and mortality. A prospective population-based study.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a distressing symptom in patients with terminal cancer. It is often under-assessed or remains unrecognized among health care professionals due to difficulties in identifying symptoms. However, fatigue ratings have not been studied extensively in incurable, terminally ill cancer patients with palliative intent or in nurses who provide daily care in palliative care teams or units. Objective: This study examined the agreement between nurses' assessments and terminally ill cancer patients' self-assessments of CRF. Methods: The correlation between patients' scores on the Cancer Fatigue Scale (CFS) and nurses' scores on the Japanese version of the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS-J) was matched in patient-nurse pairs. Paper versions of the questionnaires were answered by the patients and nurses at the time of the temperature check. Results: Twenty-eight participants in 14 pairs with valid responses were included. There were 10 cases (71.4%) of agreement between the patients' and nurses' assessments of fatigue via the CFS and STAS-J, respectively. Among the four cases (28.6%) of incongruence, two (14.3%) were underestimated, and two were overestimated. Significant correlations were observed between the STAS-J and physical fatigue (rs = 0.66, Conclusion: Differences were primarily observed in affective fatigue; therefore, nurses must carefully consider affective fatigue when assessing fatigue in patients with terminal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.