ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2025
Lung ultrasound in neonates and children with cardiac diseases with focus on post cardiac surgical period: time for systematic use-an expert opinion report by the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology Imaging Working Group.
Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite lung ultrasound (LUS) gaining consensus for the diagnosis of pulmonary complication in paediatric acute care setting and in adult cardiology, its use in paediatric cardiology remains limited. Aim: The aim of the present investigation is to provide an expert opinion on the applications of LUS in neonates and children with congenital heart disease, with a special focus on the post-surgical period. Methods and Results: A complete guide for identification of landmarks and major signs (A and B lines) and their characteristics is provided. Diagnostic criteria, tips, and tricks for the diagnosis, and differential diagnosis of common pulmonary diseases such as pleural effusion, pneumonia, and consolidation are provided. To perform diagnosis of pneumothorax is illustrated. Applications of LUS for evaluation of hemidiaphragm motility and for a comprehensive assessment of retrosternal area are also discussed. The use of LUS for guidance of minor, common interventional procedures such as lung recruitment and drainage insertion is also described. The report also highlights current gaps of knowledge, including the difficulty for quantitative estimation of pleural effusion and atelectasis, and future prospective. Conclusion: There is sufficient evidence to support a systematic use of LUS for the diagnosis and follow-up of neonates and children with cardiac disease especially those undergoing paediatric cardiac surgery. LUS is an easy, accurate, fast, cheap, and radiation-free tool that should become a routine in daily practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.