Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40007650›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2025

Gender disparity in hepatobiliary endoscopy training and delivery: Results of a nationwide survey.

Sreelakshmi Kotha, Matthew Long, Philip Berry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sreelakshmi KothaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3144-503X
Matthew LongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Philip BerryDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and study aims: There are far fewer female, independent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) practitioners than men in the UK. This study aimed to explore what lies behind the disparity by examining the current state of training, attitudes, and other factors that may influence trainees' decision to pursue ERCP training, with a view to identifying modifiable factors. Methods: Anonymized responses to an electronic survey distributed to gastroenterology trainees and independent ERCP practitioners in the UK were collected and analyzed. Results: Of 214 respondents 45% were female. Whereas gender distribution in non-hepatobiliary therapeutic endoscopy was balanced, only 29% of ERCP trainees were female. Eighty percent of those who worked less than full time (LTFT) were female, but 32% felt that LTFT was incompatible with ERCP training. Concerningly, one-quarter of female respondents reported that they had been discouraged. It was noted that females are often treated differently within endoscopy units, including by patients. Fifty percent of females indicated that radiation exposure affected their decision to train in ERCP, compared with 22% of males. A question specific to trainers revealed that 95% felt that male gender was associated with increased confidence. In free-text responses, valuable insights into trainees' personal experiences were provided, and a selection is presented. Finally, strategies to redress the gender imbalance are proposed. Conclusions: Gender disparity in HPB endoscopy exists and is stark. Underlying this are attitudes, assumptions, and environmental factors that will require systemic and sustained correction. Ideas about how to address this challenge need to be explored.

Indexed as

Pancreatobiliary (ERCP)Quality and logistical aspectsQuality managementTraining

Identifiers

PMID40007650
PMCPMC11855222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.