ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
Mobile stance-taking in nature: an exploration of gaze patterns during assessments of objects in nature.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, I examine the interactional dynamics of walkers assessing entities in nature, focusing on gaze behavior during these sequences. The analysis is based on a corpus of 10 hiking pairs who walked through the Black Forest National Park while wearing mobile eye-tracking glasses to record their gaze behavior and verbal practices. Using a combined quantitative and qualitative approach, the research identifies gaze patterns in 127 sequences and highlights the role of bodily-visual practices. Contrary to existing literature, the findings indicate that mutual gaze in this setting is not used to mark affiliation but instead occurs only during strong disagreements about initial assessments. During agreements, walkers maintain a triangular position, both gazing at the assessable object without looking at each other. Thus, in this context, gazing at each other serves different interactional purposes, as this study will demonstrate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.