ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2025
Radiation-induced rescue effect on human breast carcinoma cells is regulated by macrophages.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The link between macrophage polarization and response to radiotherapy in cancers: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The susceptibility of cancer cells to DNA damages is influenced by their microenvironment. For example, unirradiated neighbors of irradiated cells can produce signals that reduce DNA damages. This phenomenon, known as Radiation-Induced Rescue Effect (RIRE), has profound implications on the efficacy of radiotherapy. Using bystander cells co-cultured with mock-irradiated cells as a control, we demonstrated, for the first time, two types of RIRE. Conditioned medium from naïve by stander cells, i.e., cells not exposed to irradiated cells, could mitigate UV-induced DNA damages in human breast carcinoma MCF7 cells, as judged by phospho-H2AX and 53BP1 immunostaining. This protective effect could be further enhanced by the prior treatment of bystander cells with factors from UV-irradiated cells. We named the former effect "basal RIRE" and the latter "active RIRE" which were cell type-dependent. As bystanders, MCF7 showed a significant active RIRE, whereas THP1-derived macrophages showed a strong basal RIRE but no active RIRE. Interestingly, RIRE of macrophages could further be modulated by polarisation. The basal RIRE of macrophages was abolished by M1 polarisation, while M2 and Tumour Associated Macrophages (TAM) demonstrated pronounced basal and active RIRE. When mixtures of MCF7 cells and polarised macrophages were used as bystanders, the overall RIRE was dictated by macrophage phenotypes: RIRE was suppressed by M1 macrophages but significantly enhanced by M2 and TAM. This study shows a previously unappreciated role of the innate immune system in RIRE. Depending on polarised phenotypes, macrophages in the tumour microenvironment can interfere with the effectiveness of radiotherapy by adjusting the RIRE magnitudes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.