ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2025
Technique for repair of recurrent aortic valve dehiscence.
Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Re-operation for aortic paravalvular leak or multiple dehiscences due to Behcet's disease or unknown causes remains a challenge. We describe a modified transmural sub-coronary suturing technique to address this issue. Between August 2022 and May 2024, the modified transmural sub-coronary suturing technique was applied in five cases of severe aortic paravalvular leak. The median follow-up period was 14 months (ranging from 8 to 19 months) with promising outcomes: no mortality, no significant paravalvular leak, no atrioventricular block, and no need of re-operation. Our transmural sub-coronary suturing technique with external Dacron strip reinforcement demonstrates good short-term outcomes. Further long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.