Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40007552›Full record

ArticleJournal of the knowledge economy2024

Farmer-Centred Multi-stakeholder Platforms: From Iterative Approach to Conceptual Embedding.

Edith van Ewijk, Martha Ataa-Asantewaa, Kwabena O Asubonteng, Yves P B Van Leynseele, Mercy Derkyi, Anna Laven, Mirjam A F Ros-Tonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the knowledge economy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edith van EwijkDepartment of Geography, Planning and International Development Studies and Centre for Sustainable Development Studies, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7248-4743
Martha Ataa-AsantewaaDepartment of Geography, Planning and International Development Studies and Centre for Sustainable Development Studies, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kwabena O AsubontengDepartment of Natural Resources and Geo-Information Sciences, University for Development Studies, Nyankpala Campus, P.O. Box TL1882, Tamale, Northern Region Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-4969-3277
Yves P B Van LeynseeleDepartment of Geography, Planning and International Development Studies and Centre for Sustainable Development Studies, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5900-555X
Mercy DerkyiSchool of Natural Resources, University of Energy and Natural Resources (UENR), P.O. Box 214, Sunyani, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-6735-3252
Anna LavenKIT Royal Tropical Institute, Mauritskade 63, 1092 AD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mirjam A F Ros-TonenDepartment of Geography, Planning and International Development Studies and Centre for Sustainable Development Studies, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6606-7430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on knowledge exchange in multi-stakeholder platforms (MSPs) within smallholder farmer settings has primarily focused on adaptive designs and increased innovation rates. This paper addresses a knowledge gap by providing insights into the limited understanding of how knowledge sharing in MSPs can be inclusive of smallholder farmers' knowledge. It shares experiences with a farmer-centred approach to learning and knowledge-sharing with smallholder farmers in Ghana and places this iteratively developed approach within a theoretical perspective. We relate the farmer-centred approach to five design principles inspired by human-centred design rules and inclusive development dimensions. Findings from observations, interviews, and focus group discussions illustrate how the farmer-centred approach creates multifunctional spaces for peer-to-peer learning, interaction with institutional actors, and network building (design principle 1). Prior farmer-centred research ensured that themes addressed were relevant to participant farmers and brought their innovations 'from below' to the table (design principles 2 and 3). A majority representation of farmers, facilitation by local researchers, and organising platform meetings at the district level created a safe space for farmers to share their knowledge and feel included and empowered (design principle 4). Several local institutional actors took ownership of the platform principles, which created opportunities for their manifestation in future collaborations with farmers (design principle 5). However, challenges remain in engaging crucial actors from higher scale levels and reducing donor dependency. The design principles presented in this paper contribute to the genuine inclusion of farmers' knowledge and innovations. We recommend government agencies at the national and district levels incorporate these design principles into their work plans and budgets and prioritise farmers' knowledge and innovation capacity for inclusive learning and knowledge co-creation. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13132-023-01661-7.

Indexed as

Farmer-centred MSPsGhanaInclusive learningInnovations ‘from below’Knowledge co-creationRelational learning

Identifiers

PMID40007552
PMCPMC11852531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.