ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Osteotomy across arcuate line in ilium needs prudence in curved periacetabular osteotomy.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to measure the optimal osteotomy angle and length, as well as the available width of the osteotomy site in the posterior column for the safe performance of periacetabular osteotomy. Methods: Fifty-six hips in 41 patients who underwent curved periacetabular osteotomy were evaluated. Computed tomography data were subjected to multiplanar reconstruction to measure parameters in two reference planes: the functional pelvic plane and the anterior pelvic plane. The optimal osteotomy angle, osteotomy length, and available width of the posterior column were defined. We assessed the possible factors affecting the optimal osteotomy angle. Results: The functional pelvic plane showed an average and maximum anterior pelvic tilt of 7.8° and 16.4°, respectively, from the anterior pelvic plane. The optimal osteotomy angles had comparable dispersions in the functional pelvic plane and anterior pelvic plane reference planes. Furthermore, as the rotation angle of the reconstructed axial views increased, i.e., the osteotomy site became closer to the arcuate line of the pelvis, the available width of the osteotomy site narrowed, and the length of the osteotomy site increased. We found significant correlations between the optimal osteotomy angle and sex, height, weight, body mass index, head lateralization index, and acetabular anteversion in all planes. The multiple regression analysis revealed that acetabular anteversion was significantly correlated with the optimal osteotomy angle in all planes, while height, weight, BMI, center edge angle, acetabular roof obliquity, and head lateralization index were correlated in some planes. Conclusions: Osteotomies near the arcuate line of the pelvis are considered particularly risky because long-distance osteotomies must be performed within a narrow width. The optimal osteotomy angle is affected by many factors, including acetabular anteversion, which varies from case to case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.