Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40007521›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025

Osteotomy across arcuate line in ilium needs prudence in curved periacetabular osteotomy.

Kazuki Orita, Koji Goto, Yutaka Kuroda, Toshiyuki Kawai, Yaichiro Okuzu, Yugo Morita, Shuichi Matsuda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kazuki OritaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Koji GotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kindai University Hospital, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Yutaka KurodaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshiyuki KawaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Yaichiro OkuzuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Yugo MoritaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Shuichi MatsudaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to measure the optimal osteotomy angle and length, as well as the available width of the osteotomy site in the posterior column for the safe performance of periacetabular osteotomy. Methods: Fifty-six hips in 41 patients who underwent curved periacetabular osteotomy were evaluated. Computed tomography data were subjected to multiplanar reconstruction to measure parameters in two reference planes: the functional pelvic plane and the anterior pelvic plane. The optimal osteotomy angle, osteotomy length, and available width of the posterior column were defined. We assessed the possible factors affecting the optimal osteotomy angle. Results: The functional pelvic plane showed an average and maximum anterior pelvic tilt of 7.8° and 16.4°, respectively, from the anterior pelvic plane. The optimal osteotomy angles had comparable dispersions in the functional pelvic plane and anterior pelvic plane reference planes. Furthermore, as the rotation angle of the reconstructed axial views increased, i.e., the osteotomy site became closer to the arcuate line of the pelvis, the available width of the osteotomy site narrowed, and the length of the osteotomy site increased. We found significant correlations between the optimal osteotomy angle and sex, height, weight, body mass index, head lateralization index, and acetabular anteversion in all planes. The multiple regression analysis revealed that acetabular anteversion was significantly correlated with the optimal osteotomy angle in all planes, while height, weight, BMI, center edge angle, acetabular roof obliquity, and head lateralization index were correlated in some planes. Conclusions: Osteotomies near the arcuate line of the pelvis are considered particularly risky because long-distance osteotomies must be performed within a narrow width. The optimal osteotomy angle is affected by many factors, including acetabular anteversion, which varies from case to case.

Indexed as

Curved periacetabular osteotomyMultiplanar reconstructionOsteotomy anglePelvic anatomy

Identifiers

PMID40007521
PMCPMC11849105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.