ReviewBritish journal of haematology2025
Understanding erythroid physiology and pathology in humanized mice: A closer look.
Review in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Stepwise Evolution of Immunodeficient Mouse Models: Focus on NCG Strains and Their Applications in Humanized Immune System Research.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Toxicological Assessment of the Marine-Derived Cyclic Dipeptide Cyclo(Pro-Tyr) Using In Vitro, Zebrafish Embryo, and BALB/c Mouse Models.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Article
- Combinatorial base editing couples disease correction with lineage amplification in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Understanding erythroid physiology and pathology in humanized mice: A closer look.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Erythropoiesis, the process of red blood cell (RBC) development from haematopoietic stem cells, is crucial in haematology research due to its intricate regulation and implications in various pathologies such as anaemia and haemoglobinopathies. Humanized mice, created by introducing human cells or tissues into immunodeficient mice, offer a promising avenue in vivo approach. However, challenges persist in fully replicating human erythropoiesis in these models, particularly in generating mature human RBCs capable of sustained circulation. This review discusses the differences between human and mouse erythropoiesis, recent progress made using refined humanized mouse models for studying human erythropoiesis and erythropoietic disorders, the challenges that impede a faithful mimicking of human phenotypes in these mice and recommendations for future research improvements. Despite progress being made, enhancing the translational potential of humanized mouse models for human erythropoiesis research remains a priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.