Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40007125›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2025

Structured Demographic Buffering: A Framework to Explore the Environmental Components and Demographic Mechanisms Underlying Demographic Buffering.

Samuel J L Gascoigne, Maja Kajin, Shripad Tuljapurkar, Gabriel Silva Santos, Aldo Compagnoni, Ulrich K Steiner, Anna C Vinton, Harman Jaggi, Irem Sepil, Roberto Salguero-Gómez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. More social species live longer, have longer generation times and longer reproductive windows.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Samuel J L GascoigneDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2984-1810
Maja KajinDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9996-5897
Shripad TuljapurkarBiology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5549-4245
Gabriel Silva SantosNational Institute of the Atlantic Forest (INMA), Santa Teresa, Espírito Santo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7991-8807
Aldo CompagnoniInstitute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenburg, Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8302-7492
Ulrich K SteinerInstitute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1778-5989
Anna C VintonDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8279-1736
Harman JaggiBiology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1563-4917
Irem SepilDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3228-5480
Roberto Salguero-GómezDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6085-4433

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T008881/1Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 301343/2023-3Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 430170797Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 506492810Directorate for Biological Sciences 2010783Marie Curie Fellowship 101032484Natural Environment Research Council NE/M018458/1Royal Society DHF\R1\211084Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust BRR00060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental stochasticity is a key determinant of population viability. Decades of work exploring how environmental stochasticity influences population dynamics have highlighted the ability of some natural populations to limit the negative effects of environmental stochasticity, one of the strategies being demographic buffering. Whilst various methods exist to quantify demographic buffering, we still do not know which environmental components and demographic mechanisms are most responsible for the demographic buffering observed in natural populations. Here, we introduce a framework to explore the relative impacts of environmental components (i.e., temporal autocorrelation and variance in demographic rates) on demographic buffering and the demographic mechanisms that underly these impacts (i.e., population structure and demographic rates). Using integral projection models, we show how demographic buffering is more sensitive to environmental variance relative to environmental autocorrelation. In addition, environmental autocorrelation and variance impact demographic buffering through distinct demographic mechanisms-i.e., population structure and demographic rates, respectively.

Indexed as

EcosystemEnvironmentModels, BiologicalAnimalsDemographyPopulation DynamicsStochastic Processesenvironmental variabilityintegral projection models (IPMs)life history strategiesstochastic demography

Identifiers

PMID40007125
PMCPMC11862329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.