ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025
Evaluation of Co-Developed Strategies to Support Staff of a Mental Health Community Managed Organisation Implement Preventive Care: A Pilot Controlled Trial.
Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMental health community managed organisations (CMOs) are well placed to provide preventive care, including behaviour change conversations to address smoking, nutrition, alcohol and physical activity (snap). This study evaluates the impact of co-developed preventive care implementation support strategies, including Healthy Conversation Skills (HCS) training on CMO staff attitudes and perceptions relating to preventive care for snap behaviours.
methodsA non-randomised controlled pilot trial was undertaken (October 2021-May 2022) with two branches of a mental health CMO (n = 1 target; n = 1 control) in NSW, Australia. Target group staff received a three-month implementation support package co-developed by staff and researchers, including HCS training and educational materials. Staff from both groups completed an online survey at baseline and follow-up, reporting barriers and facilitators and perceived individual and organisational ability to provide preventive care for each behaviour. Pre and post HCS training, target staff completed surveys reporting barriers and facilitators to having behaviour change conversations, and competency of using 'open discovery questions' (a key HCS skill).
resultsBaseline (n = 27) and follow-up (n = 17) surveys showed mean scores increased for the target group and decreased for the control group for n = 4/8 barrier and facilitator outcomes, and n = 7/8 perceived individual and organisational ability of providing care outcomes. Sixteen target group staff participated in HCS training and surveys, with scores improving for skills (p = 0.0009), beliefs about capabilities (p = 0.0035), intentions (p = 0.0283), participant confidence (p = 0.0043), perceived usefulness (p = 0.004), and competence in using open discovery questions (p < 0.0001).
conclusionsThis pilot trial demonstrates the feasibility and potential effectiveness of a co-developed implementation support package at increasing mental health CMO staff capacity to provide preventive care for multiple health behaviours. SO WHAT?: This evidence can inform future research trials and health policy aimed at supporting CMO staff in delivering comprehensive preventive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.