Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40006990›Full record

ReviewViruses2025

Factors Affecting Phage-Bacteria Coevolution Dynamics.

Ghadeer Jdeed, Bogdana Kravchuk, Nina V Tikunova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ghadeer JdeedInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospect Lavrentieva 8, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2907-1155
Bogdana KravchukInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospect Lavrentieva 8, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2066-8975
Nina V TikunovaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospect Lavrentieva 8, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.

Funding

Russian state-funded project for ICBFM SB RAS 122110700002-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophages (phages) have coevolved with their bacterial hosts for billions of years. With the rise of antibiotic resistance, the significance of using phages in therapy is increasing. Investigating the dynamics of phage evolution can provide valuable insights for pre-adapting phages to more challenging clones of their hosts that may arise during treatment. Two primary models describe interactions in phage-bacteria systems: arms race dynamics and fluctuating selection dynamics. Numerous factors influence which dynamics dominate the interactions between a phage and its host. These dynamics, in turn, affect the coexistence of phages and bacteria, ultimately determining which organism will adapt more effectively to the other, and whether a stable state will be reached. In this review, we summarize key findings from research on phage-bacteria coevolution, focusing on the different concepts that can describe these interactions, the factors that may contribute to the prevalence of one model over others, and the effects of various dynamics on both phages and bacteria.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacteriophagesBiological CoevolutionBiological EvolutionHost Microbial InteractionsEvolution, MolecularHost-Pathogen Interactionsarms race dynamicscoevolutionfluctuating selection dynamicshost range expansionphage adaptationphage therapy

Identifiers

PMID40006990
PMCPMC11860743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.