ReviewViruses2025
Diagnostic Assays for Avian Influenza Virus Surveillance and Monitoring in Poultry.
Review in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A colorimetric readout based on the PrestoBlue® dye as an objective method for measuring neutralizing antibodies against influenza virus in human serum samples.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Comprehensive pathological, immunohistochemical, and apoptotic analysis of the highly pathogenic avian influenza a virus H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b in poultry in Taiwan.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Advances in Avian Diagnostic Pathology: Current Trends, Challenges and Future Directions: A Review.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Review
- Biosensor Technologies for Avian Influenza Detection: A New Frontier in Rapid Diagnostics for HPAI.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Avian Influenza Viruses: Global Panzootic, Host Range Expansion and Emerging One-Health Threats.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Evaluation of risk-based antigen and antibody surveillance strategies and their association with HPAI outbreaks in South Korean duck farms.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnostic testing plays a key role in a surveillance program as diagnostic testing aims to accurately determine the infection or disease status of an individual animal. Diagnostic assays for AIV can be categorized into four broad types: tests for detecting the virus, its antigen, its genomic material, and antibodies to the virus. Virus characterization almost always follows virus detection. The present article surveys the current literature on the goals, principles, test performance, advantages, and disadvantages of these diagnostic assays. Virus isolation can be achieved using embryonating eggs or cell cultures in a lab setting. Virus antigens can be detected by antigen-capturing immunoassays or tissue immunoassays. Viral RNA can be detected by PCR-based assays (gel-based reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), or probe or SYBR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.