ArticleViruses2025
Statistical Distributions of Genome Assemblies Reveal Random Effects in Ancient Viral DNA Reconstructions.
Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Oncogenic HPV types identified in Paleolithic and Chalcolithic human genome sequencing data from Ust'-Ishim and Ötzi.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ancient human viruses have been detected in ancient DNA (aDNA) samples of both Anatomically Modern Humans and Neanderthals. Reconstructing genomes from aDNA using reference mapping presents numerous problems due to the unique nature of ancient samples, their degraded state, smaller read sizes and the limitations of current methodologies. The spurious alignments of reads to reference sequences (mapping) are a main source of false positives in aDNA assemblies and the assessment of signal-to-noise ratios is essential to differentiate bona fide reconstructions from random, noisy assemblies. Here, we analyzed the statistical distributions of viral genome assemblies, ancient and modern, and their respective random "mock" controls used to evaluate the signal-to-noise ratio. We tested if differences between real and random assemblies could be detected from their statistical distributions. Our analysis shows that the coverage distributions of (1) real viral aDNA assemblies of adenovirus (ADV), herpesvirus (HSV) and papillomavirus (HPV) do not follow power laws nor log-normal laws, (2) (ADV) and control aDNA assemblies are well approximated by log-normal laws, (3) negative control parvovirus B19 (real and random) follow a power law with infinite variance and (4) the mapDamage negative control with non-ancient DNA (modern ADV) and the mapDamage positive control (human mtDNA) are well approximated by the negative binomial distribution, consistent with the Lander-Waterman model. Our results show that the tails of the distributions of aDNA and their controls reveal the weight of random effects and can differentiate spurious assemblies, or false positives, from bona fide assemblies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.