Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40006644›Full record

ReviewVaccines2025

Development, Current Status, and Remaining Challenges for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines.

Cleo Anastassopoulou, Snežana Medić, Stefanos Ferous, Fotini Boufidou, Athanasios Tsakris

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AS01Drug safety · 2026
    Article
  6. Vaccinations in patients with interstitial lung diseases: a narrative review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cleo AnastassopoulouDepartment of Microbiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7666-9198
Snežana MedićDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-5778-9861
Stefanos FerousDepartment of Microbiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0009-0003-4670-5786
Fotini BoufidouNeurochemistry and Biological Markers Unit, 1st Department of Neurology, Eginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9691-9465
Athanasios TsakrisDepartment of Microbiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0656-4715

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes significant morbidity and mortality, especially in young children and the elderly. RSV vaccine development puzzled vaccinologists for years. Safety concerns of initial formulations, the lack of an absolute correlate of protection, and the need for selecting appropriate virus attenuation and antigen-adjuvant combinations contributed to delayed vaccine production. The recent stabilization of the RSV-F glycoprotein in the prefusion (preF) conformation that constitutes the primary target of RSV-neutralizing antibodies was key for efficient vaccine design. Two protein subunit vaccines (GSK's Arexvy and Pfizer's Abrysvo) and one mRNA RSV vaccine (Moderna's mRESVIA) are now available. This article aims to provide a comparative overview of the safety and efficacy of novel RSV vaccines that are approved for the prevention of RSV-lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) in adults 60 years of age and older, with updated recommendations calling for the expansion of vaccination to all adults at increased risk for severe RSV disease. Abrysvo is the only vaccine indicated for use in pregnancy to prevent RSV-LRTD in infants from birth to 6 months of age. We provide a comparative assessment of the efficacy of approved RSV vaccines over a maximum of three seasons, summarizing currently available data. We conclude that despite the decreasing vaccine efficacy over time, which should be anticipated for a virus that is characterized by short-term immunity, efficacy was clinically meaningful over placebo. The increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome post vaccination with Abrysvo or Arexvy, which prompted the FDA to require the inclusion of such warnings in the prescribing information of these two RSV vaccines, should be prioritized and investigated thoroughly. Furthermore, ongoing vaccine surveillance and further evaluation, particularly among immunocompromised patients, frail elderly subjects, and young infants that were under- or not represented in pivotal clinical trials, are necessary. As in the success story of combined pediatric vaccines, combination vaccines, conferring protection against several respiratory illnesses in one dose, could help improve vaccine acceptance and coverage rates in older adults.

Indexed as

lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD)maternal immunizationolder adultsprefusion F vaccinerespiratory syncytial virus (RSV)

Identifiers

PMID40006644
PMCPMC11860200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.