Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40006568›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2025

Non-Invasive Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoproteins (Cas9 RNPs) into Cells via Nanoparticles for Membrane Transport.

Toshihiko Tashima

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Nanocarrier-mediated CRISPR-Cas delivery: a novel approach against antibiotic-resistant superbugs.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Toshihiko TashimaTashima Laboratories of Arts and Sciences, 1239-5 Toriyama-cho, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 222-0035, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) system is a promising biotechnology tool for genome editing. However, in living organisms, several pharmacokinetic challenges arise, including off-target side effects due to incorrect distribution, low bioavailability caused by membrane impermeability, and instability resulting from enzymatic degradation. Therefore, innovative delivery strategies must be developed to address these issues. Modified nanoparticles offer a potential solution for the non-invasive delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (Cas9 RNPs). Cas9 RNPs encapsulated in nanoparticles are protected from enzymatic degradation, similar to how microRNAs are shielded within exosomes. It is well-established that certain materials, including proteins, are expressed selectively in specific cell types. For example, the α-7 nicotinic receptor is expressed in endothelial and neuronal cells, while the αvβ3 integrin is expressed in cancer cells. These endogenous materials can facilitate receptor-mediated endocytosis or transcytosis. Nanoparticles encapsulating Cas9 RNPs and coated with ligands targeting such receptors may be internalized through receptor-mediated mechanisms. Once internalized, Cas9 RNPs could perform the desired gene editing in the nucleus after escaping the endosome through mechanisms such as the proton sponge effect or membrane fusion. In this review, I discuss the potential and advantages of delivering Cas9 RNP-encapsulated nanoparticles coated with ligands through receptor-mediated endocytosis or transcytosis.

Indexed as

CRISPR/Cas9drug delivery systemnanodeliveryreceptor-mediated endocytosis/transcytosistransmembrane substance delivery

Identifiers

PMID40006568
PMCPMC11859894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.