ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Quantum Variational vs. Quantum Kernel Machine Learning Models for Partial Discharge Classification in Dielectric Oils.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantum Variational vs. Quantum Kernel Machine Learning Models for Partial Discharge Classification in Dielectric Oils.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, electrical discharge images are classified using AI with quantum machine learning techniques. These discharges were originated in dielectric mineral oils and were detected by a high-resolution optical sensor. The captured images were processed in a Scikit-image environment to obtain a reduced number of features or qubits for later training of quantum circuits. Two quantum binary classification models were developed and compared in the Qiskit environment for four discharge binary combinations. The first was a quantum variational model (QVM), and the second was a conventional support vector machine (SVM) with a quantum kernel model (QKM). The execution of these two models was realized on three fault-tolerant physical quantum IBM computers. The novelty of this article lies in its application to a real problem, unlike other studies that focus on simulated or theoretical data sets. In addition, a study is carried out on the impact of the number of qubits in QKM, and it is shown that increasing the number of qubits in this model significantly improves the accuracy in the classification of the four binary combinations studied. In the QVM, with two qubits, an accuracy of 92% was observed in the first discharge combination in the three quantum computers used, with a margin of error of 1% compared to the simulation obtained on classical computers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.