ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Effect of Difference of Sensory Modality in Cognitive Task on Postural Control During Quiet Stance.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- IMU-Based Analysis of Task-Dependent Associations Between Anticipatory Postural Adjustments and Gait Speed Under Dual-Task Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neurosensory Integration and Balance Adaptation: Personalization of Postural Control Through the Prism of Individual Spatial Perception.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Influence of cognitive function on postural control in physically independent older women: a time and time-frequency domain analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive loads impact postural control; however, the specific influence of sensory modalities employed in cognitive tasks during motor-cognitive dual tasks remains unclear. This study investigated the distinct effects of visual and auditory cognitive tasks on static postural control while controlling for differences in task content. Twenty-five healthy young adults were instructed to maintain a quiet stance on a force plate under three cognitive task conditions: a single motor task (control), a paced visual serial addition task (visual), and a paced auditory serial addition task (auditory). Center of pressure (COP) displacements were measured, and both linear (e.g., sway area) and non-linear assessments of postural control were analyzed. Results revealed a significant reduction in sway area during cognitive tasks compared to the control condition. However, under the auditory condition, the power spectrum density of COP displacements in the moderate frequency band was significantly higher than those in the control and visual conditions, accompanied by a notable increase in the mean power frequency. These findings suggest that auditory cognitive load exerts a more significant effect on postural control than visual cognitive load during motor-cognitive dual tasks. This highlights the relevance of sensory modalities in cognitive loads for effective fall-risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.