Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40006493›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Federated Learning Framework for Real-Time Activity and Context Monitoring Using Edge Devices.

Rania A Alharbey, Faisal Jamil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rania A AlharbeyDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal JamilSchool of Computing, Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Ulster University, Derry-Londonderry BT48 7JL, Northern Ireland, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing need for effective elderly care solutions, this paper presents a novel federated learning-based system that uses smartphones as edge devices to monitor and enhance elderly care in real-time. In this system, elderly individuals carry smartphones equipped with Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensors, including an accelerometer for activity recognition, a barometer for altitude detection, and a combination of the accelerometer, gyrometer, and magnetometer for location tracking. The smartphones continuously collect real-time data as the elderly individuals go about their daily routines. These data are processed locally on each device to train personalized models for activity recognition and contextual monitoring. The locally trained models are then sent to a federated server, where the FedAvg algorithm is used to aggregate model parameters, creating an improved global model. This aggregated model is subsequently distributed back to the smartphones, enhancing their activity recognition capabilities. In addition to model updates, information on the users' location, altitude, and context is sent to the server to enable the continuous monitoring and tracking of the elderly. By integrating activity recognition with location and altitude data, the system provides a comprehensive framework for tracking and supporting the well-being of elderly individuals across diverse environments. This approach offers a scalable and efficient solution for elderly care, contributing to enhanced safety and overall quality of life.

Indexed as

AccelerometryAgedAlgorithmsFederated LearningHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicSmartphonealtitude detectioncontextual monitoringelderly care monitoringfederated learninglocation tracking

Identifiers

PMID40006493
PMCPMC11861869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.