ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Sensor-Fusion Based Navigation for Autonomous Mobile Robot.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lightweight 2.5D SLAM with Dynamic Map Refinement and Height-Aware Encoding for Resource-Constrained Indoor Robots.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Real-World Benchmark of Monte Carlo-Assisted EKF Odometry for Online Pose Estimation in 2D LiDAR SLAM.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Precision Farming with Smart Sensors: Current State, Challenges and Future Outlook.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hybrid real-synthetic dataset framework for robotic hazard detection in industrial environments.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- QL-HIT2F: A Q-Learning-Aided Adaptive Fuzzy Path Planning Algorithm with Enhanced Obstacle Avoidance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Energy-Aware Sensor Fusion Architecture for Autonomous Channel Robot Navigation in Constrained Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An Improved Two-Step Strategy for Accurate Feature Extraction in Weak-Texture Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fault Point Search with Obstacle Avoidance for Machinery Diagnostic Robots Using Hierarchical Fuzzy Logic Control.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Navigation systems are developing rapidly; nevertheless, tasks are becoming more complex, significantly increasing the number of challenges for robotic systems. Navigation can be separated into global and local navigation. While global navigation works according to predefined data about the environment, local navigation uses sensory data to dynamically react and adjust the trajectory. Tasks are becoming more complex with the addition of dynamic obstacles, multiple robots, or, in some cases, inspection of places that are not physically reachable by humans. Cognitive tasks require not only detecting an object but also evaluating it without direct recognition. For this purpose, sensor fusion methods are employed. However, sensors of different physical nature sometimes cannot directly extract required information. As a result, AI methods are becoming increasingly popular for evaluating acquired information and for controlling and generating robot trajectories. In this work, a review of sensors for mobile robot localization is presented by comparing them and listing advantages and disadvantages of their combinations. Also, integration with path-planning methods is looked into. Moreover, sensor fusion methods are analyzed and evaluated. Furthermore, a concept for channel robot navigation, designed based on the research literature, is presented. Lastly, discussion and conclusions are drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.