Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40006459›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Gait Parameters Can Be Derived Reliably and Validly from Augmented Reality Glasses in People with Parkinson's Disease Performing 10-m Walk Tests at Comfortable and Fast Speeds.

Pieter F van Doorn, Daphne J Geerse, Jara S van Bergem, Eva M Hoogendoorn, Edward Nyman, Melvyn Roerdink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pieter F van DoornDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3208-3475
Daphne J GeerseDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jara S van BergemDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0007-4531-642X
Eva M HoogendoornDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-4554-3628
Edward NymanStrolll Ltd., Stafford ST16 2LP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9425-5412
Melvyn RoerdinkDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8534-1124

Funding

This project is funded by the EMIL project financial support to third parties, which is funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union. Neithe
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 10-m walk test (10MWT) is a stopwatch-based clinical mobility assessment. To better understand mobility limitations, 10MWT test completion times may be complemented with gait parameters like step length. State-of-the-art augmented reality (AR) glasses can potentially do this given their unique 3D-positional data from which gait parameters may be derived. We examined the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and face validity of gait parameters derived from AR glasses during a 10MWT in 20 people with Parkinson's disease, performed at self-selected comfortable and fast-but-safe walking speeds. AR-derived 10MWT completion times and gait parameters (mean step length, cadence, and maximal gait speed) were compared across repetitions and with lab-based (Interactive Walkway) and clinical (stopwatch) reference systems. Good-to-excellent test-retest reliability statistics were observed for test completion times and gait parameters for all systems and conditions alike. Concurrent validity was demonstrated between AR, lab-based, and clinical references for test completion times (good-to-excellent agreement: ICC > 0.879) and gait parameters (excellent agreement: ICC > 0.942). Face validity was confirmed by significant differences in test completion times and gait parameters between speed conditions in a-priori expected directions. These findings support the conclusion that gait parameters can be derived reliably and validly from AR glasses in people with Parkinson's disease.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityGaitParkinson DiseaseWalk TestAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsWalkingWalking Speed10-m walk testaugmented realityconcurrent validityface-validitygait speedParkinson’s diseasetest-retest validity

Identifiers

PMID40006459
PMCPMC11860048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.