ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Multimodal Pain Sentiment Analysis System Using Ensembled Deep Learning Approaches for IoT-Enabled Healthcare Framework.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Pain in Alzheimer's Disease: Disrupted Multilevel Integration of Nociception, Affective Processing and Clinical Expression Across Clinical and Preclinical Evidence.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Towards Intelligent Pain Monitoring Systems: A Survey of Recent Technologies and Methods.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Benchmarking quantum kernels and modern vision models for compound facial expression recognition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a multimodal sentiment analysis system to assess and recognize human pain sentiments within an Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled healthcare framework. This system integrates facial expressions and speech-audio recordings to evaluate human pain intensity levels. This integration aims to enhance the recognition system's performance and enable a more accurate assessment of pain intensity. Such a multimodal approach supports improved decision making in real-time patient care, addressing limitations inherent in unimodal systems for measuring pain sentiment. So, the primary contribution of this work lies in developing a multimodal pain sentiment analysis system that integrates the outcomes of image-based and audio-based pain sentiment analysis models. The system implementation contains five key phases. The first phase focuses on detecting the facial region from a video sequence, a crucial step for extracting facial patterns indicative of pain. In the second phase, the system extracts discriminant and divergent features from the facial region using deep learning techniques, utilizing some convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures, which are further refined through transfer learning and fine-tuning of parameters, alongside fusion techniques aimed at optimizing the model's performance. The third phase performs the speech-audio recording preprocessing; the extraction of significant features is then performed through conventional methods followed by using the deep learning model to generate divergent features to recognize audio-based pain sentiments in the fourth phase. The final phase combines the outcomes from both image-based and audio-based pain sentiment analysis systems, improving the overall performance of the multimodal system. This fusion enables the system to accurately predict pain levels, including 'high pain', 'mild pain', and 'no pain'. The performance of the proposed system is tested with the three image-based databases such as a 2D Face Set Database with Pain Expression, the UNBC-McMaster database (based on shoulder pain), and the BioVid database (based on heat pain), along with the VIVAE database for the audio-based dataset. Extensive experiments were performed using these datasets. Finally, the proposed system achieved accuracies of 76.23%, 84.27%, and 38.04% for two, three, and five pain classes, respectively, on the 2D Face Set Database with Pain Expression, UNBC, and BioVid datasets. The VIVAE audio-based system recorded a peak performance of 97.56% and 98.32% accuracy for varying training-testing protocols. These performances were compared with some state-of-the-art methods that show the superiority of the proposed system. By combining the outputs of both deep learning frameworks on image and audio datasets, the proposed multimodal pain sentiment analysis system achieves accuracies of 99.31% for the two-class, 99.54% for the three-class, and 87.41% for the five-class pain problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.